Question: Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages. If these are not taught, many are at risk of dying out. In your opinion, is it important for everyone to learn English? Should we try to ensure the survival of local languages and, if so, how?
Answer: The question of whether to prioritize learning English over preserving local languages sparks debate. English’s global role is vital for jobs and connections, yet local languages carry culture. This essay explores why English matters, the value of local languages, and suggests a balanced approach.
English is a key to global communication, work, and learning. It links diverse people and opportunities. Thus, learning English makes practical sense in our connected world.
However, local languages are not just words—they reflect culture and identity. Losing them erases traditions and divides generations. So, finding a balance between English and local languages is crucial.
Protecting local languages can happen through education and community support. Teaching these languages at school boosts awareness. Cultural groups and local efforts can also help keep languages alive.
To sum up, English learning is crucial for global engagement. Still, saving local languages is vital for our cultural tapestry. A mix of teaching English and nurturing local languages can bridge cultures and keep our linguistic heritage alive.
